Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persimmon (color)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 00:57, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Persimmon (color) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable; it's a dictionary definition. bobrayner (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment See also:
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenic (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iceberg (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mantis (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polar bear (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timberwolf (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denim (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangria (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceil
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheat (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaver (color)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flavescent
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink-orange
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xanadu (colour) (2nd nomination)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuscan red
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regalia (color)
- Thanks for your time; bobrayner (talk) 18:25, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – another color that's unsourced except for a mention in one book's color list, like most of the others. Dicklyon (talk) 05:58, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of significant use of this term as a colour name, let alone substantial coverage in reliable sources. Also, the article is no more than a dictionary definition, but Wikipedia is not a dictionary. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:00, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 16:50, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article doesn't show in any way that this color name is significantly used, or that it has significant color in sources- it's covered in a dictionary by the looks of it, which must be how we have a dictionary definition as an article. I can't imagine this article being expanded from a one-line dictionary definition into a full article.--Slon02 (talk) 17:25, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this and most of the others. This term may be used occasionally to describe a color which resembles that of a persimmon, but such usage is not common enough or notable enough to warrant its own article. --MelanieN (talk) 17:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.